The Importance of Light in A Streetcar Named Desire :: A Streetcar Named Desire Essays

This paper will discuss the use of light in the play, A Streetcar Named Desire, by Tennessee Williams.Blanches relation to light is quite obvious because she tries toavoid bright light of any kind. Her reaction to light fuel beregarded as an tone-beginning to hide her true nature as well as hervanishing beauty and youth. By hiding from the light, she tries toescape reality. She covers the naked light bulb with a Chinese paperlantern, saying, I cant stand a naked light bulb, any more than Ican a rude find or a vulgar action (Sc.3 p. 2093). This remarkshows that Blanche would rather hide behind polite phrases than accepttruth and reality. The paper lantern is not very stable, though, andit can easily be destroyed, just like her illusions. In scene six,she relegates Mitch home with her and says, Lets leave the lights off(Sc.6 p. 2309). Blanche thinks of Mitch as a future husband, and consequently she does not expect him to kat once her past or her true age, andthe best way to hide her age is to stay out of bright light where hecould possibly see her wrinkles and fading youth in her face. Laterin that scene, Blanche testifys Mitch about her husband Allan When Iwas sixteen, I made the discovery love. All at once and much, muchtoo completely. It was like you suddenly turned a blinding light onsomething that had always been half in shadow, thats how it strickenthe world for me (Sc. 6 p. 2113).In her past, light used to represent love, but now it representssomething destructive for her. Allans suicide erases the light orlove, and thus she now does not believe in it any longer and tries toescape from the light and therefore escape reality.When Mitch tears off the paper lantern in order to take a closer lookat her in the bright light, she utters a frightened gasp (Sc. 9 p.2125). Then she tells him, I dont want realism. I want magic Yes, yes, magic I try to give that to people. I misrepresent thingsto them. I dont tell truth, I tell what ought to be truth.

Socrates and Socrates: A Philosophical Pair for the Ages Essay

In Walter Mosleys Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned, the reader is introduced to Socrates Fortlow, an ex-convict who served twenty-seven years for murder and rape. Fortlow is plagued by guilt and, seeing the chaos in his town, feels a need to improve not only his own standards of living, but also those of others in Watts. He attempts this by teaching the people in Watts the lessons he feels will resolve the many challenges the neighbourhood faces. The lessons Fortlow teaches and the methods by which he teaches them are very similar to those of the ancient classic philosopher for whom Fortlow was named We was poor and country. My mother couldnt afford school so she figured that if she named me after somebody smart then maybe Id bunk smart (Mosley, 44). Though the ancient Greek was born to be a philosopher and Fortlow assumed the philosopher role as a response to the poor state of his breeding and Watts, both resulted in the same required instruction to their populations. The two Socrates both utilize a form of teaching that requires their pupil to become engaged in the lesson. They emphasize ethics, logic, and feelledge in their instruction, and place importance on epistemology and definitions because they feel a problem cannot be solved if one does not first know what it is. Socrates was essential in first introducing these concepts to the world and seemed to be born with them inherent to his being, Fortlow has learned the ideals through life experience and is a real-world application in an demesne that needs the teachings to get on track. While the two men bear many similarities, their differences they are attributed primarily as a result of their circumstances translate the basis of Fortlows importance in Watts and as a modern-... ...Devious or Divine. Greece & Rome 2nd ser. 32.1 (1985) 32-41. Web. .Groeller, Alison D. From Rage to Reason run for and Politics In Walter Mosleys Socrates Fortlow Novels. Crossroutes The Meanings of Race in the 21st Cen tury. Ed. Paola Boi and Sabine Broeck. Munster Lit Verlag, 2003. 161-72. Google Scholar. Web. Mosley, Walter. Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned. New York Washington Square, 1998. Print. Socrates. Free Study Guides for Shakespeare and Other Authors. Web. 10 Mar. 2012. . Socrates. The Basics of Philosophy. Web. 10 Mar. 2012. . Taylor, C. C. W. Socrates. Oxford Oxford UP, 1998. Print. Wilson, Charles E. Walter Mosley A Critical Companion. Westport, CT Greenwood, 2003.

Interaction of Human Culture and the Environment :: Environment Environmental Pollution Preservation

Interaction of Human Culture and the EnvironmentIn the mid(prenominal) 1970s and early 1980s, the field of clinical psychology underwent a revolution with the emergence of family therapy. Therapists initially understood disorders as being the result of a linear range of a function of causality. For instance, one theory of schizophrenia held that the disorder resulted from exposure to a certain pattern of behavior on the part of the patients mother. Mothers of schizophrenics were often found to be particularly cold, unresponsive, dominant, and conflict-inducing towards their children. Researchers argued that such schizophrenogenic behavior was the direct cause of the disorder. Successful treatment, indeed, required the patient and mother to examine their relationship and seek out better, more positive methods of interaction. Family therapists, however, then began to realize that the etiology of the disorder was far more complex than simply the mother inducing the disorder deep dow n the child. The schizophrenic and the mother were enmeshed within a complex system of interactions both within, as well as outside, the family. Thus, the schizophrenic was affected by both his mother and father, the schizophrenic himself had an impact on his parents, the father and mother affected each other through their marital relationship, and social and cultural norms had an overall impact on all members of the family. Family systems researchers realized that these non-homogeneous relationships were constantly changing, and that each one had a significant effect on the others. Problems within the family were now understood in terms of circular causality alternatively than linear. For instance, it might very well be true that the schizophrenics mother is cold, conflict-inducing, and unresponsive towards him. It is in addition true, however, that the schizophrenic manifests very bizarre behavior, such as hearing voices, playing on paranoid impulses, hallucinating, and displa ying inappropriate (or flat) emotional responses. These behaviors would certainly affect the mother, as she would be stressed and deeply concerned for her childs well being. The mother might also be affected by a strained marital relationship with her husband, which itself might be vetoly impacted by the childs schizophrenic behavior. Finally, the family might be negatively affected by the society in which they live, as their neighbors or colleagues might view them as outcasts and purposely isolate them because of their childs inappropriate behavior. Ultimately, this series of negative interactions may result in a feedback loop, in which maladaptive behavior is amplified and the childs schizophrenic behavior worsens.